ASME RTP-1c-2003-explain
|
ID： |
4D0A0EE2E1E64EA3A9943809646600DF |
|
文件大小(MB)： |
0.28 |
|
页数： |
8 |
|
文件格式： |
|
|
日期： |
2013-7-8 |
|
购买： |
文本摘录（文本识别可能有误，但文件阅览显示及打印正常，pdf文件可进行文字搜索定位）：
ASHE RTP-1*INT ** OVSTbVO 0570S22 054,班港分享网,“F!”*jy/ 6"r 衿广［e,INTERPRETATIONS TO ASME RTP-1,(Interpretations are not part of ASME RTP-1 -1995 and are included for information only.),INTRODUCTION,As a service to persons who use the RTP-1 Standard, the RTP Committee renders interpretations of the,requirements upon request. The procedure for requesting an interpretation is described in the following,paragraphs. .,The interpretations include all replies that have been approved by the RTP Main Committee in response,to inquiries concerning interpretation of the Standard.,An interpretation applies either to the edition and addenda in effect on the date of issuance of the,interpretation or the edition and addenda stated in the interpretation. Subsequent revisions to the Standard,may supersede the interpretation .,PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING INTERPRETATIONS,On request, the RTP Committee will render an interpretation of any requirement of RTP-1, Interpretations,can only be rendered in response to a written request, which should be addressed to:,Secretary, RTP Main Committee,The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,United Engineering Center,345 East 47th Street,New York, NY 10017,The request for interpretation should be clear and unambiguous. It is further recommended that the,inquirer submit his request using the following format.,(a) Subject, Cite the applicable paragraph number(s) and/or give a concise description of the subject.,(b) Question. Phrase the question as a request for an interpretation of a specific requirement suitable,for general understanding and use, not as a request for an approval of a proprietary design or situation.,The inquirer may also include any plans or drawings which are necessary to explain the question; however,they should not contain proprietary names or information.,Requests that are not in this format may be rewritten in this format prior to being answered, which may,inadvertently change the original intent of the request.,ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of an interpretation when or if additional information is,available which the inquirer believes might affect the interpretation. Further, persons aggrieved by an,interpretation may appeal to the cognizant ASME committee or subcommittee. ASME does not "approve,",''certify,'' "rate,“ or “endorse“ any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.,303,Copyright by the American Society Of Mechanical Engineers,Tue Apr 13 13:51:56 2004,STD.ASHE RTP-1C-ENGL mfi ■ D75Tb7D 口5斗口己口口 5fl7 .,RTP-1 Interpretations No. 3 31 32 3-3, 3-4,(c) Interpretation: 3-1,Subject: RTP-1-1995 Edition, Para. 8r220(b)(3),Date Issued: September 17, 1996,Question: Paragraph 8-220(b)(3) in RTP-l states: ^evaluation and approval of material manufacturers,and suppliers of parts and subcontracted services in accordance with Appendix M-6.5, Is this responsibility,truly addressed in Appendix M-6?,Reply; No.,(c) Interpretation: 3-2,Subject: RTP-1-1995 Edition, Paras, 2A-3OO and M8-200(b),Date Issued: October 8, 1996,Question: Does a Fabricator have to produce a design basis laminate for each resin/reinforcement,combination used in an RTP-1 vessel?,Reply: Yes.,(c) Interpretation: 3-3,Subject: RTP-1-1995 Edition, Para. 8-220(0,Date Issued: December 18, 1996,Question: The scope of Part 8 in RTP-1 makes reference to fabricated subcontracted services. Are,independent testing facilities included in the requirements for surveying and auditing?,Reply: No.,(c) Interpretation: 3-4,Subject: RTP-1-1995 Edition, Overlay Joints,Date Issued: January 27, 1997,Question: Within RTP-1, are not overlay joints simply laminates involving a correct combination of resin,and reinforcing under environmentally acceptable conditions?,Reply: Yes.,304.3,Copyright by the American Society Of Mechanical Engineers,Tue Apr 13 13:52:04 2004,STD. ASNE RTP-1C-ENGL 11cle18 ■ □?5c1b7D □5TD2D1 M13 ■,3-5, 3-6 RTP-1 Interpretations No. 3,(c) Interpretation: 3-5,Subject: RTP-I-1995 Edition, Design Rules for Conical Body Sections and Horizontal Vessels,Date Issued: March 6，1997,Question (1): May vessels containing a conical body section be designed and fabricated in accordance,with RTP-1 rules?,Reply (I): Yes. See Subpart 3B design rules and also para. NMl-200.,Question (2): May horizontal vessels be designed and fabricated in accordance with RTP-I rules?,Reply (2): Yes. See Subpart 3B design rules and also para. NM1-300.,Question (3): Do the rules of RTP-1 impose any size limitations on vessels?,Reply (3): No.,(c) Interpretation: 3-6,Subject: RTP-I-1995 Edition, Para. 8-220(f),Date Issued: March 12, 1997,Question (I): Must all suppliers of subcontracted services be……
……